Kathmandu. The Revenue Investigation Department, through the Revenue Investigation Office, has filed a case against four people in Tulsipur, Butwal, on charges of customs evasion and importation. The department has completed an investigation into the crime of revenue leakage and filed a case against 4 people, including the proprietor of Navjyoti Traders, Saurabh Yadav, in the Tulsipur High Court, Butwal, alleging that they sold taxable goods worth more than Rs 34.762 crore.
While analyzing the business transactions of the seller, Saurabh Yadav, proprietor of Navjyoti Traders, and the buyer, Pushpa Sharma, operator of Agwan Stores and Order Suppliers, located in Ward No. 08, Ramgram Municipality, Nawalparasi District (Basup), it was found that the seller had sold taxable goods worth more than Rs 5 million, but the taxpayer was not registered with the VAT and had repeatedly made rice bills and illegally imported Indian sugar by evading customs duties.
Private Since the taxpayer has committed an offense contrary to Section 3 of the Revenue Evasion (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052 (Sans) and as per Sub-sections (a), (b), (c) and (i) of Section 4, in the case of the respondent Saurabh Yadav, the total amount of VAT and customs evasion in the case of the respondent is 34,762,753 and 23 paisa, and the amount is recovered from the respondent as per Section 23(1) of the Revenue Evasion (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052, and a fine of 100 percent is imposed and the maximum imprisonment is imposed as per Section 23(1)(b) of the same Act. The respondent buyer Pushpa Sharma is hereby sentenced to pay a fine of 1,171,500 and to commit an act prohibited under Section 3 of the Revenue Evasion (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052, and to commit an act prohibited under Section 4, Clauses (a), (b), (c), (g) and (i) of Section 4. In the case of the offence of including Section 23 (1) of the Act, the amount may be confiscated and a fine of one hundred percent may be imposed and imprisonment up to the limit may be imposed as per Section 23 (1) (a) of the same Act.
Similarly, in the case of the defendant Hikmat Prasad Acharya, since it is seen that he directly assisted the buyer Pushpa Sharma, half the punishment is demanded as per Section 23 (3) of the Revenue Leakage (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052, and in the case of the defendant Binod Thapa, since it is confirmed that he was involved in the said revenue leakage offence, a case has been filed in the Tulsipur, Butwal Bench of the Honorable High Court, Butwal Bench, with a demand for a fine as per Section 33 (3) of the Revenue Leakage (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052. It has been done.
प्रतिक्रिया दिनुहोस्